🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting amendments to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about business sector influence with public health regulations. Last month, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying everywhere. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” stated Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be reduced to less than half “according to global guideline limits”, delayed for at least one year after the law is enacted.

The WHO specifically advises a warning should cover at least 50% of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for various offences “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch states the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the impact needed for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and collect the yield and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “The company operates its activities following with current country statutes. Moreover, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, adding that minors should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to achieve intended population health targets, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which includes increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.